Is the NYPD 'Blue'-Washing the facts in the Omar Edwards Case?
Police respond to scene in
in pursuit of a carjack thief. (Keivom/News)
Les Payne
May 31, 2009
“The greatest fear I had as a police officer on duty was
being shot by a white cop,” said a NYPD veteran over lunch in
The 25 year old officer was chasing a thief caught rifling through his car when a plain-clothes sergeant and his partner arrived. “Even a black cop running with a gun,” said the veteran officer, “is all some of these hot-heads need to start shooting.” Such a sight moved Andrew Dunton to squat behind the door of his unmarked anti-crime car and squeeze off 6 shots.
The rookie officer likely never realized that his stalkers were cops. A fatal bullet struck Edwards in the back, two others in the left side and arm. He died in his Police Academy T-shirt, his shield and identification in his pocket.
The white cop-shoots-fellow-black officer scenario is all
too common. It recalls: the ’94 case of Desmond Robinson, shot in the back 4
times by Peter Del-Debbio; the ’98 incident of Sgt. Dexter Brown wounded in the
back by Louis Lopez, a white Hispanic; and the ’06 incident, in which Alfredo
Toro was shot dead in the
It is impossible to eliminate race/ethnicity as the prime factor in these cop shootings. There is no record of a black NYPD officer similarly killing a white cop. Yet, in a city predominantly non-white, an African-American officer has been shot by white cops every 3.75 years during the last 15. One police source who keeps score reportedly recorded the number of black officers downed by such hostile fire as 30 over the years.
With an election coming, Mayor Bloomberg and his police chief are working mightily to filter any facts bearing on this sharp racial divide that might hurt his chances of returning to office. Official details will be slow and whitewashed.
As with all cases of cops gunning down the black innocent, the NYPD will paint its stonewalling blue.
What message does the Omar Edwards killing send to young, African-American boys who want to become cops?
This particular twist on police misbehavior, I submit, is a scare tactic designed to suppress any affirmative increases in black enrollment on the force. Why would a service-minded cadet pursue a career where, in addition to the normal challenges of street policing, he faces the ever-present threat of hostile fire from his white colleagues?
This suppression of the black presence serves the privilege of hyphenated, white immigrants who have long dominated the NYPD.
Instead of drawing from local, high-potential, city talent,
for example, the department continues to fill its ranks from faraway, exclusive
white enclaves. Nothing in the sterile upbringing of recruits from such
hinterlands as
The cop who killed Officer Edwards, for example, this
Dunton, resides in Ridge, Long Island, some 68 miles from
So it is with the Edwards killing that—in the “post racial” Obama era--sustains the same old NYPD policy. Law enforcement, by way of street practice, is protected as a preserve for white power and prerogatives in the City.
Even
Referring to the fatal shooting in his district, this most powerful lawmaker said: “Whether it’s me. Whether it’s [U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder], or indeed, whether it’s the President of the United States, running for a bus can jeopardize you—just because of your color—in a community like ours.”
Is this not a shameful admission of the high crime of political neglect by a black leader who has presided over an admittedly oppressed district for 38 years?
What other emperor at the height of his power would acquiesce to the brutalizing and periodic killing of his own people as a police instrument of control and ethnic cleansing?
Just as curious is reaction of a consortium of “100 Blacks in Law Enforcement Who Care,” but won’t let on to exactly what it is they truly care about.
In a public meeting at
My thinking here is that token representation breeds token behavior on the police force. All too often black cops tend to imitate the entrenched behavior of the institution. A lone cop who seeks to make sergeant in a precinct that vamps on blacks and Hispanics would, for reasons of personal ambitions over group values, opt to look the other way when an Abner Louima is brutalized in the station bathroom, or when an Omar Edwards is shot dead.
The “100 Black” officers group, I proposed could improve City policing immensely by (a) sensitizing their fellow white cops on racial fairness, and (b) improving their presence beyond the token stage to, say 20 percent.
The president of the African-American group, as did his
comparable group leader in
Meanwhile, the citizenry concerned about fairness and justice is at the mercy of a campaigning billionaire mayor and his commissioner, a media in denial about race, and a preacher with his hands out.
The gaggle of black leaders in the City, and yes, even Rep. Rangel, must somehow find their voices and muster the courage to act.
Otherwise, God help us all.






I am compelled to respond to your innacurate assessment of the position of "100 Blacks in Law Enforcement Who Care".First and foremost we have never been a 'fraternal' organization but rather a civil & human rights organization.Our mission and obligation has been to educate and support our community utilizing our practical knowledge of law enforcement. Secondly, the membership of the organization has a long, documented history of directly confronting ignorance, bigotry and racism in the law enforcement.You have obviously failed to research the positions and career sacrifices made by our membership for well over a decade in an effort to provide voice and support to the Black community. Your cheap shot charge of cowardice is absurd and we have never been 'quasi' anything and will gladly put our record of community involvement and commitment up against any black law enforcement organization that you can mention.What we care about is the support and education of our community and that concern has led us to conduct thousands of workshops throughout the City including but not limited to What to Do When Stopped By the Police', What to Do When Going To Court, Senior Safety, Gang Awareness, Parental Awareness and other less formal interactive workshops.What we have done is testified at City, State and Federal hearings about the harsh and uncomfortable realities of Police-Community relations.What we have done is provide support and guidance to individuals, families and organization who find themselves at an information disadvantage as they seek justice for their individual case.We have and continue to respect your journalistic integrity however you are woefully ill equipped to advise seasoned law enforcement activists on what is needed to create a more racially tolerant and respectful Police Department.Your 2 suggestions clearly show your naivete on this subject. First, it is not the obligation or mission of ANY fraternal or civil rights organization to sensitize white cops on racial fairness.If white, black or brown cops act and respond based on racial bias or animous than they are not suited to be Police Officers.The City has the obligation to weed out those people who are not psychologically suited to be Police Officers.To that end, we have never hesitated in naming individual Police Officers who we believed had the flaw of ignorance and racist views.We have even noted the Police Commissioner and the Mayor's failures to even have a substantive discussion about the role that race plays in enforcement strategies.Secondly, we have never believed that membership numbers indicate effectiveness.Far too many 'well respected' organizations have thousands of members however the labor is done by a handful. '100 Blacks in Law Enforcement Who Care' selects the membership based on the individual's commitment to 'give back' to the community.We have taken principled positions while still employed by our respective agencies.Les,get the facts in order.
Reply to this
I very much appreciate your most timely and relevant column. In fact, I fired off a letter to Newsday, your former employer, on this subject last night, and while I doubt that they'll print it, I made some of the points you made in this important piece. (One can expect to see letters there venting about Al Sharpton). I never expected much from Congressman Rangel, and so I got what I expected. I have seen his smiling visage on T.V. over the years, and have heard the usual "talking heads" call Rangel "powerful", even while the triplets of poverty, crime and police-abuse, along with inferior education remain as entrenched in Rangel's district over decades as any in this republic. Rangel's picture should be next to "failure" in any dictionary: I can't recall when he exercised power to improve the lives of his constituents. You may go too far in your expectations of any of the Black police organizations; theirs is a tall mountain to climb from within, and it's not clear any have the will to make such an attempt. As you suggest, it's hard to "eat the King's meat and then criticize the King". I suggested in the Newsday piece that if white officers became victims of police shootings by fellow officers-of-color the "problem" would be resolved in short order, and not by the usual "sensitivity" training now proposed. Serious issues require serious action, from top to bottom. If you've ever been in a police precinct in a Black community for an extended period one soon sees the loathing that police culture has for the poor and minorities, so-called: such contempt makes occasional shootings of even fellow officers-of-color like that of the late officer Edwards, an inevitability. The dogged issue of racism hasn't been solved because of the election of Barack Obama- the question for decent people remains: what do we do about this?
Reply to this